Son of Man Vs Son of God

Son of man
The term Son of man occurs aprox 109 times in the
Bible, and carries with it no implication of divinity.
Rather the phrase is translated in the Hebrew as Ben
Adam or in the Aramaic as Bar Enash, which is also
loosely translated in at least 12 instances as man in
general, or humanity, the first Adamic sort of two
Adams, the created of created/made things, them of
them/us (two alls), the ye do errr of ye/you, the
imperfect of imperfect/perfect parts, child of child/
man, servant of servant/son, old of old/new, first of
first/second, and of two sons of Abraham the one to
cast out (the script-u-are saith “cast out the
bondwoman and her son”: Gal 4); allegorically
speaking of law of law/grace and lie of lie/truth in
such things are an allegory.
So “like unto Son of man” in Revelation 1,2,3 speaks
of being like unto first Adam, or them (which is
Adam in Gen 5:2), which is like unto a vessel fit for
destruction; for them of them/us is the counter part
in such a two part shew about a third part. And once
the point of such is understood, the counter part is to
be done away; Not to mention God is one, of us, with
us, for us, and hath given us the victory thru JC.
Son of man should repent: Numbers 23:19
When looking at the Son of Man in the OT, especially
in Ezekiel (the prophet Ezekiel is addressed as “Son of
man” aprox 94 times), we find such a man and his
God(law) are pretty much against everyone. Daniel is
also referred to as Son of man (Daniel 8:15-17). When
looking at the Son of Man in the NT we find such to
be sin and iniquity conscious, also vengeful to those
who betrayed him, divisional, ransom orientated, a
sign unto a wicked generation, cloudy, to be lifted up
as a serpent, hath no where to lay his head(God), is
judgmental to the point of two resurrections of the
dead unto life and damnation (Jn 5:27-29), decends
and ascends to where he was before, at the right hand
of the power(gospel) of God(law), seen of Stephen
standing on right hand of God (as if Satan), sits on a
cloud (confusion) with a sharp sickle in his hand
(word of God is “sharper”), and has a “two-edged
sword” (word of God is “sharper” than any two-edged
sword) coming out his mouth, promises 12 thrones to
12 apostles to judge 12 tribes, etc.
When the Son of Man is revealed, as a law
avenger: Luke 17:30, Jude 1:15;
Then it’s destruction for them all: Luke 17:29;
1Thessalonians 5:3; Jude 1:5
Son of God
The Son of God neither obeyed nor disobeyed any law
at all, nor imputed any sin, paid a visit not a ransom,
hath no respect of persons (all same, since all one, but
not them all of two alls: “them all” and “us all”; so he
is long-suffering to “us-ward”). That Jesus Christ is
come, but is not come to condemn any (Jn 3:17), nor
to accuse any (Jn 5:45), such that none are lost by
being sow condemned by law, which is a ministration
of condemnation. Out of his mouth comes the word of
God which is “sharper than any two-edged
sword” (Heb 4:12), and by him is only resurrection to
life. He is merciful not merciless, ascends higher than
the heavens, and is entered therein to appear for us in
the presence of God.
Son of God vs Son of God: Christ of CJ vs
Christ of JC
Clarity: Jesus Christ (not Christ Jesus) is the Son of
God: Mark 1:1. By JC came grace and truth (not law
and lie of Moses: John 1:17)). He was not sent to
condemn(law) the world (John 3:17; John 8:3-11), nor
would he accuse(law) any as Moses did (John 5:45);
No, not this; But rather “that”: that “through” him:
through Jesus (born under law, of woman) -> Christ
(the end of the law) -> God (all grace), the world
might be saved (graced) only; saved from law: sin and
death: such like: sin imputation, accusation,
condemnation, death, of law: the ministration of
No man can say Jesus is Lord butt by the Holy
Ghost (law law thereof)
For further clarity (as was the purpose of the gospel
according to Luke: 1:1-3), it is “Christ” (of “Jesus ->
Christ”) who is the “Son of God”: Luke 4:41, since
“Jesus” (of “Jesus -> Christ” or of “Christ -> Jesus”) is
also clarified as being the tormentor(law) of such law
-> grace: Luke 8:38. Such is confirmed oft, such as in
John 11:27; 20:31; Acts 9:20; Galatians 2:20;
Ephesians 4:13.
John the Baptist (Expired Law) got Beheadead
John the Baptist saw it backwards, saying that this
(instead of this -> that) is the Son of God, noting such
baptizes with the merciless Holy Ghost (rather than
with the merciful Holy Spirit). John the Baptist did
accuse(law) and condemn(law); And for such lawing
he was beheaded; Allegoric for the end of law: the age
of grace.
Back-ward of Law Grace
John also saw it backwards, portraying Jesus (1John
5:5) and the apparition like unto the Son of man as
the Son of God (Revelation 2:18), from whom is to
come wrath & vengeance, not peace nor love. John
notes a Holy Ghost God gave witness Jesus was the
Son of God. But such does not even agree with the
gospel of John: 3:17; Which is the only “verily verily”
gospel account of four accounts.
We are the body of Christ, not the body of
The “name” of the “only begotten” Son of God is grace
(Christ: the end of the law), not law (Jesus: made
under the law). He that believeth on him is not
condemened(lawed)… ye are not under the law
(Jesus), but under grace(Christ)… which things are
an “allegory”, and a “mystery” to solve in time, lest all
perish by law(Jesus) instead of none perish by grace
(Christ). ES is through Jesus->Christ.
Son of man vs Son of God
Son of Man is always associated with them, division
and destruction: 1Thessalonians 5:3; Whereas Son of
God is associated with us: 1Thess 5:9 whom God hath
not appointed unto wrath (law worketh wrath), nor
destruction which comes upon “them” who say Peace
& Safety (Grace & Law), safety in law. Not!
The law (and lie) was given by
But grace and truth came by
Jesus Christ.
God is not a man that he should lie. Lie = Law.
The Son of man is not the Son of God; For God is not
a man that he should lie(law), nor the Son of man
that he should repent(change). Notably God never
changes: I will “never leave thee nor forsake thee”, nor
does the Son of God: Jesus Christ “the same”
yesterday, to day, and for ever. It is we all who must
change, are being chanGed (as from ye to you in Jn
8:32), changed by the Spirit: 2Corinthians 3. It is we
who must take the grace walk, “from faith to faith”
and “from glory to glory”, as if first from mtn to mtn,
then even “higher than the heavens”; for God & Son
are both on Sion in two mtns of Hebrews 12. But at
Hebrews 12:1 the walk notably becomes an end “run”
unto Hebrews 13:25, as if to what’s above a servant,
or unto a more excellent way than either a broad way
or a narrow way; as the third of three.
“Lord Also” of the Sabbath = One Lord too
What’s interesting about “Son of man”, is he’s “Lord
also of the Sabbath”: Mk 2:28 (see also Mt 12:8; Lk
6:5), and Revelation takes place on the Sabbath.
However when looking at such it seems to be a
Sabbaths shewdown, also a shewdown of Lords;
which is allegorically a final final examination and
shewdown of law vs grace. Notably it was the sabbath
when Jesus made the clay (Jn 9:14). The sabbath was
made for man, and not man for the sabbath (Mark
2:27). However this sabbath is not the eternal day of
God, but the annual day of atonement, which speaks
of the “affliction of souls”, which speaks of impure
religion: law (not pure religion: grace), which speaks
of “the law worketh wrath”, which speaks of
“destruction” (not salvation), which speaks of
“them” (not us).
Contrary things cannot coexist in peace. So
there’s a Sabbath shewdown.
To better understand the twain, and the difference
between “contrary things”, consider the two ends of
the last millennium, where the first (Y2K) was the
false, fearful, and costly end; which coincidentally had
a countdown of 3 1/2 yrs (42 mos) from Greenwich in
June 1996 – December 1999. So mid trib rapture folk
missed it, not to mention both the pre trib and post
trib folk also missed it. And what followed was the
real end. With all thy getting, get it: “understanding”
= “grace glory” (Prov 4).
Lord Also? Son of Man is Lord also of the
So Son of man is “Lord also of the sabbath” (the black
sabbath of twain sabbaths); But only until one of
twain Lords is decisively made the Lord of Lords, and
one of twain Sabbaths is made the Sabbath, the day
of God (not the day of the LORD).


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s